Colten Boushie and a Legacy of Injustice

Article by David Doyle,
Author LOUIS RIEL, Let Justice Be Done (Ronsdale Press, 2017)

On Friday, February 9, 2018, a jury in Battleford, Saskatchewan, deliberated thirteen hours before finding a Caucasian farmer, Gerald Stanley, not guilty of second degree murder in the 2016 death of Colten Boushie, a resident of the Red Pheasant First Nation. Red Pheasant Chief Clint Wuttunee called the acquittal “Absolutely Perverse… Colten Boushie was shot in the back of the head at point blank range. Nevertheless, an all white jury formed the twisted view of that obvious truth and found Stanley not guilty.” Unfortunately, this tragic trial has many precedents bearing directly on individual Indigenous individuals and families, whole nations and Canada wide.

Colonial Canada

With the Confederation of Canada in 1867 came the transfer of legislative and judicial control to the new Canadian Prime Minister, John A. Macdonald, who immediately began to consolidate his new nation and meddle in the affairs of the Indigenous nations domiciled across the land. In 1869, the new Canadian Parliament passed the now “notorious” Indian Act. Based firmly on the Eurocentric ‘Doctrine of Discovery,’ this most colonial of Acts declared that “Indians” could not be in lawful possession of any land without a permit from the Minister; incredibly, this included the ancient homelands of the Mi’kmaq of the east coast, the Huron of the St. Lawrence region and Great Lakes Regions, the Cree and Dene of the great boreal forests and all others such as the Mohawks of Ontario, and the Cree, Assiniboine and Blackfoot nations of the Plains and the hundreds of nations on the West Coast – all the way up to the Innu of the Arctic. All of these Indigenous peoples had ancient rights to their lands, as well, many had “rights” granted by Britain for services rendered. This monumental interference in the affairs of the Indigenous nations and their right to their hereditary and treatied lands was also contrary to the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the subsequent treaties made between Britain and the Indigenous nations. In many cases, the British had relied upon these nations for military support in her extended wars with the French and the Americans and guaranteed them certain rights that Canada now rescinded. Not only in natural fact, but also in British law, Aboriginal “Indian ownership” of land, based both on hereditary right and legal right, pre-dated the Canadian Confederation, often by centuries and had been guaranteed by both the British monarchy and legal system. None of this was a concern to the pragmatic John A. Macdonald and the eager Canadian colonialists. Indigenous peoples were completely denied their land and human rights. The “Indians” were now “wards” of the fledgling Canadian state, with no rights, especially property rights.

Destitution and Starvation

With the diminishing buffalo herds of the 1870’s, and the loss of opportunities to supply the fur trade, along with the perdition of the American whiskey traders and wolfers, the situation in the North-West Territories had reached disaster. Not only did the Indigenous peoples not have enough to eat, their clothes and homes were also deteriorating – with no chance of repair as there were few buffalo left to supply the necessities of life.

The First Nations peoples north of the Medicine Line (Canada-U.S. border) began looking towards new means of survival. Initially they looked at protecting the buffalo herds, but this was nearly impossible with American hide hunters slaughtering 80,000 buffalo on the Canadian plains in one winter. In their councils, the People were asking important questions as alternate sources of food and security had to be found. Contrary to cultural stereotypes the Indians were not ignorant of nor opposed to agriculture. They had seen that the settlers could raise large quantities of food and now they too had to seriously consider food production as a means of survival. They also knew it was necessary to come to terms with the Canadian government or possibly lose their all. They knew they had to look at a new question, the question that would determine their fate: their relationship with their “mother earth.”

The Canadian government claimed it would help the People learn to grow crops if they would settle on small parcels of land and give up the rest of their land to the Canadians. The “Great Mother,” as the government fashioned itself, would assist in the next great transition – if the Indian people would but sign a Treaty. It was a life and death decision. The First Nations peoples were not children, as the term “Great Mother” implied. They knew full well that a treaty meant giving up part of their birthright, part of their Indigenous rights and part of their mother; the earth upon which they slept. They also knew that unless they were extremely vigilante, treaties meant submitting to complete political and economic subjugation as had happened so many times to the Peoples in the United States. But, with their children and old people starving, it was necessary to make a deal for survival – there was no more ready food on the whole of the Canadian prairie. They had no choice: treaty or die!

On May 23, 1873, John A. Macdonald’s government received Royal Assent for the formation of a new paramilitary police force. The North-West Mounted Police (NWMP) was a force specifically designed to assert Canadian sovereignty over the North-West. Wearing “Red Coats” as the British had done over the centuries, the NWMP were given a responsibility to gain the “confidence and respect” of the Indians, paving the way for Anglo-Canadian jurisdiction and Prime Minister John A. Macdonald’s dream: a proposed “Canadian” Pacific railway. Although small in number the police would bring British “justice” to the North West. These mounted policemen, known as “Mounties,” initially built Fort Walsh in the Cyprus Hills. They then sent out patrols and circled “Whoop-Up country” only to find that the American banditos and murderers had slipped out of the whiskey shacks and gone back across the border before being arrested by the Canadian police. As time went on, the mounted police would go on to build a number of posts throughout the North-West Territories and take up their other key assignment; settlement of the Indians onto reservations.


The British North America Act (BNA Act) stipulated that the new Dominion of Canadian had legislative authority for “Indians and lands reserved for Indians.” Treaty No. 1 & Treaty No. 2 were signed in Southern Manitoba. Treaty No. 3 followed in the Lake of the Woods area in 1873, Treaty No. 4 in the Qu’Appelle Valley, Treaty No. 5 at Beren’s River and Norway House and Treaty No. 6 at Fort Carlton and Fort Pitt in 1876. These post-Confederation treaties recognized Indian tenure on lands that were still in Indian possession, followed by negotiations and termination of tenure with the conclusion of a formal land surrender document and payment by Canada of compensation: financial or material or both. It was a system that served the government, if not the Indians, very well. In these treaties the final agreement stated that the Indians had to:

Cede, release, surrender, and yield up to the Government of the Dominion of Canada for her majesty the Queen and Her successors forever, all their rights, titles and privileges whatsoever to the lands…. the Queen hereby agrees and undertakes to lay aside reserves for farming lands… to be administered and dealt with for them by Her Majesty’s Government of the Dominion of Canada in such a manner as shall seem best.

As word reached the peoples of the Eagle Hills of the problems of those who had previously signed treaty, each group approaching treaty was wiser to the process. In 1876, Treaty 6 was negotiated at the Hudson’s Bay Company’s Carlton House and later at Fort Pitt. The chief concern at Carlton House was preparation for a new future, a future the Cree now knew, with the buffalo all but gone, would have to be agriculture based, relying on support from the government. The interpreter and scribes of the Commissioner recorded these negotiations. They are worthy of attention as they set the tone for the next great transition: Reserve life. There is however a very serious “one-sided” problem with the record of negotiations: Peter Erasmus. A Métis, Erasmus was the interpreter for the Indians. Shortly after the negotiations began Erasmus admitted that as he was in the pay of the Treaty Commissioner: “My sympathies transferred to the Governor’s side.”

After lengthy negotiations, the signing of the treaties was an agreement based on two distinct realities. Within these two realities were two cultures, one oral that gave its bond symbolically and one that used the written word as the basis of legal agreement. One system was based on trust and the other based on the “interpretation” of reality. Historically this means all materials generated out of the treaties is an interpretation of the treaty process from the side of the Anglo-Canadians. For the “Peoples of the Plains” the question at hand was one of survival. Resistance to the Treaties was still high and the People who went onto the little isolated reserves had gone for one reason, to guarantee their survival. Their numbers were not settled and their leadership was often hostile to the terms of the Treaty, but for the People it was a new venture and they felt they needed to follow on their word and live “treaty.” For the Canadian politicians it was not the question of Indian survival that was foremost, but the elimination of the “Indian problem.” The Treaties had solved the key legal problem of how to extinguish Native title to the land in preparation for the construction of the Canadian Pacific Railway and the opening up of British North America to settlement.

The Reserve System

The “Reserve System” was designed to solve the next problem: How to control the Indian! The reserves were to be “a training ground or laboratory for civilizing the Indian.” Less direct than the American solution of extermination, the goal was a form of “assimilation” – not racial assimilation, but cultural genocide. The Reserve system was designed to take control of the “political, social and economic activities” of the Indigenous nations. Behind the scenes, in the boardrooms of Ottawa, far from the reality of the Plains, a structure for the new system was drawn up. It was a structure absorbed from centuries of British colonial experience around the globe. They also incorporated a number of the provisions used in the United States including the introduction of a Reserve Agent who would oversee relations between the government and the People. The “Reserve Experiment” was a synopsis of colonial experience internationally, and as time went on it too would be used as a model in other colonial adventures, most notably apartheid South Africa.

The 1876 Treaty 6, involved land and resources that were loaned, but not sold, in exchange for support in agricultural resettlement. In these early treaty negotiations, the promises included the granting of one bull and one boar to each reserve plus one cow and one sow for each Chief. The government also promised to establish schools, prohibit alcohol on the reserves and to guarantee hunting and fishing rights – on unsettled portions of the land that had been ceded. However, with the large-scale movement onto the reserves, provisions were not forthcoming and the “sweet promises” were not kept. The lack of action, and cutting back on resources by Canada was all an enigma to the People. It was not what they understood or considered to be the nature of a treaty. It also became the basis of their new Aboriginal economy, an economy largely based on what can be called, “outside promises.” These were promises outside of the actual treaty. The government’s treaty obligations left things wide open to neglect and abuse: “administered and dealt with for them by Her Majesty’s Government of the Dominion of Canada in such a manner as shall seem best.” Government policy was deceptive. Time after time they were able to simply ignore their promises on the premise that the Indians “were not ready.” This “excuse” was racially, and economically, motivated, and, as at present, in the on-line ramblings of groups such as “Farmers with Firearms,” rampant chauvinism was used to divide the population on racial grounds.

Rampant Chauvinism

The first newspaper published in Saskatchewan (then the North-West Territories), The Saskatchewan Herald, was published at Battleford in August 1878 by Patrick Gammie Laurie, who had previously worked for the rampant Canadian paper The Nor’Wester opposed to Louis Riel and the Métis in Red River in the late 1860s. Publisher Laurie wrote of the problems of colonial administration in an article entitled “Tribal Relationship of the Indians.” Laurie’s view represented the “new” Anglo-Canadian mood on the prairies and is worthy of note as its editorial stance gives a very clear indication of the “frontier mentality” in British North America that still, unfortunately exists today:

The difficulty of managing the numerous tribes now incorporated in the Dominion is one, which will increase year by year. The present method of treating them as wards, or incapable children cannot be suddenly changed, but neither can it be permanently successful. The hunting grounds will be of necessity circumscribed from year to year, their necessities will be increasing and the dangers of wrongs being perpetrated and outbreaks provoked by rapacious settlers and unprincipled agents will be almost sure to grow to alarming proportions. But more than all, the best interests of the Indians themselves demand that we should aim at something more than merely helping them to prolong a wretched and aimless existence as reservations. Of course, the Government schools and Christian missions are doing something by way of teaching them the arts of civilization. But all this has hitherto been done on the supposition that the tribal relation must be preserved, and the question is whether this is not the great blunder which goes far to neutralize all other efforts… those Indians who exhibit a disposition by their industry and thrift to support themselves… deserving individuals would be separated from the band and from tribal influences… the real obstacle in the way of civilizing them.

Now that the core of their argument was out, the Saskatchewan Herald then went on with a scathing denunciation of what it saw as the problem:

… the baneful influences of the traditional rehearsal of medicine-man and the recital of deeds of sneaking thiefs, and brutal scalping expeditions of past days, inciting the innate dispositions of the young men to acts of savagery.

For those who were indolent and did not subscribe to the new order, the solution was simple: they should be removed from among the industrious members of a band, and placed upon a reserve under military supervision. Why? Because:

Persons who are in a position to know by experience, agree, that even one lazy and indolent family upon a reservation, exercise such a baneful influence at times by their conduct, as to almost frustrate the exertions of both Missionary and Instructors – hence, the necessity of special provision been made for such characters, as also, for stragglers, wandering from one reserve to another, disturbing the harmony of each in turn if possible at the same time thieving from the industrious.

The article concluded that:

… under the present doubtful condition of the Indians in the Southern department, no doubt military supervision is necessary and cannot therefore be avoided.

But the reader was not to worry as:

The fact that the Southern Indians are under military supervision will not disturb the tranquility of the Indians north, as there seems to be a general feeling of contentment amongst them throughout the Northern Department.

For the First Nations peoples on the reserves, life did not improve. Provisions were not forthcoming and in June 1881, Chief Poundmaker made a claim to the Governor-General: “the white man made…Treaty [Six]…I am not accustomed to work on a farm and am short of implements…a reaper, a mower…we cannot work in the winter. It is cold and we are naked. There is much sickness on my reserve and I would like a Doctor there.”

Canadian Aggression

Four years later, as both the Indigenous and settler populations prepared to confront Canadian colonialism in a series of constitutional campaigns, John A. Macdonald would send military forces to invade the North-West; with Major Middleton leading troops to attack Louis Riel and the Métis at Batoche, and Colonels Otter and Strange sent further west and north to round-up and attack Poundmaker in the Eagle Hills and Big Bear in the North Saskatchewan. Although neither Poundmaker or Big Bear participated in the “rebellion,” like Louis Riel, they gave themselves up to Canadian forces seeking justice and were sent to Regina for a Canadian trial. There were also eleven Indians accused of murder during the disturbances. Eight of them, including Wandering Spirit, were hanged, with the entire Eagle Hills population, young and old, forced to assemble and watch the mass hanging and the burial, in concrete, of their loved ones outside Fort Battleford. There were also forty-eight Indians who were sentenced to Stoney Mountain Penitentiary on various charges. They were forced to work at expanding the penitentiary to hold all of the Indians who were incarcerated in this ancient establishment that still, to this day, holds a majority of Indigenous prisoners.

Tragic Trials

The trial of One Arrow is tragic. He was an old man. As the chief of the Willow Cree, whose lands lies alongside the Metis settlements of Batoche, as close as teeth and lips, he was arrested at Batoche and put on trial in Regina for treason. He was tried in English by Magistrate Richardson, a personal appointee of Prime Minister Macdonald, and a member of the Territorial Council. Richardson’s hand chosen jury of six were all Anglo-Saxon farmers, settlers from Ontario with little or no history on relations with First Nations people or politics. One Arrow was subject to a long and complex set of charges contending that:

One Arrow, together with divers other evil-disposed persons to the said Alexander David Stewart unknown, armed and arrayed in a warlike manner, that is to say with guns, rifles, pistols, bayonets and other weapons, being then wickedly and feloniously assembled and gathered together against our said Lady the Queen, most wickedly and feloniously did levy and make war against our said Lady the Queen . . . and against the peace of our said Lady the Queen, her Crown and dignity.

This ancient British gibberish was translated to One Arrow indicating that he was accused of “knocking off the Queen’s bonnet and stabbing her in the behind with a sword.” One Arrow had no defence against such nonsense. When the jury returned a guilty verdict, Magistrate Richardson said he had to punish One Arrow to “make the other Indians of the country know what would become of them if they follow your bad example.” He then sentenced One Arrow to three years in jail.

On September 11, 1885 Big Bear was also brought to trial before stipendiary magistrate Hugh Richardson and a jury of six hand-picked Anglo-Saxons in Regina. Tried in English, Big Bear’s trial was once again a fraud – a show trial orchestrated by Prime Minister Macdonald, Minister of Justice Alexander and Chief Justice Wallbridge of Manitoba to ensure the great Okemah of the Cree was jailed and humiliated. Big Bear’s lawyer, Beverley Robinson, a Winnipeg lawyer appointed by the court, decided not to call all of his witnesses because he did not want to “bore” the jury. A number of these witnesses, including members of Hudson’s Bay Company Factor McLean’s family, had been prisoners of Big Bear’s band under the control of Wandering Spirit and the War Council and were supportive of Big Bear. They could provide evidence telling of his role in ensuring their safety and not participating in military decisions or actions, or being present when the killing happened at Frog Lake. Without this evidence the jury took only fifteen minutes to find Big Bear guilty of Treason Felony. On September 25, 1885 Big Bear too was sentenced to three years in the Stoney Mountain Penitentiary. In his address to the court Big Bear spoke in Cree for two hours:

Your Lordship, I am Big Bear, Chief of the Crees. The North West was mine. It belonged to me and to my tribe. For many, many moons I ruled it well. . . .

When White men were few in this land, I gave them my hand in friendship. No man can ever be witness to any act of violence by Big Bear to any White man. Never did I take the White man’s horse. Never did I order any one of my people to one act of violence against the White man… Everything that is bad has been laid against me this summer, there is nothing of it true. Had I wanted war, I would not be here now. I should be on the prairie. You did not catch me. I gave myself up. You have got me because I wanted justice.”

At Poundmaker’s trial, the key evidence was a letter which was never sent to Louis Riel. After being attacked by, and defeating, Col. Otter at Cutknife Hill, Fine Day’s War Council, seeking safety in numbers, prepared a letter preparing to join the Métis at Batoche. Poundmaker had been there when the letter was written and had signed it, along with a number of others. Although it was known that Poundmaker had prevented retaliation, and the annihilation, of the Canadian forces under Col Otter after their abortive attack on the sleeping Cree camp on Cutknife Hill, he too was convicted of treason. When Poundmaker was sentenced to three years in penitentiary, he stated, “I would rather prefer to be hung than to be in that place.”

Decolonizing Justice

The trials of these great Cree leaders set the stage, and today First Nations peoples continue to face a colonial judicial system that has oppressed Indigenous peoples since the imposition of the unequal, starvation, treaties, the implementation of the notorious Indian Act—in all its permutations, and the imposition of Canadian “Justice” with the establishment of the North-West Mounted Police and the colonial Territorial courts. Each of these leaders was “railroaded” by the Canadian Justice System. These men were not terrorists. All three deserve to have their trials re-evaluated and to be exonerated and recognized for their efforts at reconciliation 133 years ago. At present, there is an opening agreement between Poundmaker First Nation and Canada to see the “great peacemaker” exonerated.

As evidenced by the tragic death of Coulten Boushie and the trial of Gerald Stanley, the First Nations of the Eagle Hills, and Indigenous peoples across Canada, have a long history of racially biased Canadian injustice and marginalization. It is time for change with the Canadian justice system being de-colonized and justice made equal for all Canadians. My deepest condolences to the family and friends of Coulten Boushie.

Article ©: David Doyle, Powell River, BC V8A 3Z6, 604 223 3478,

2019 – 20 is the 150th anniversary of Louis Riel’s constitutional campaign guiding the entrance of the North-Western Territory and Rupert’s Land into the Canadian Confederation with the formation of the province of Manitoba.


Click here to download this article as a PDF.

3 Responses to Colten Boushie and a Legacy of Injustice

  1. Name Withheld February 15, 2018 at 12:27 pm #

    Re: The Colten Legacy

    Thank you for your insightful article Mr. David Doyle. Without such historical references change cannot occur as to why our Nations are observers to this misjustice. I believe we are witness to historical wrongs unfolding since the formation of the province of Saskatchewan and Canada. Those historical references I write about are founded in racial attitudes such as the KKK, Aryan Nations and the Orange order. I provide some history in regards to the statement.

    Although the KKK operated throughout Canada, it was most successful in Saskatchewan, where by the late 1920s its membership was over 25,000.

    The secret society, which grew in the southern United States from anger over losing the Civil War, turned its hate against the black population with chilling consequences. In Canada, it found a ready audience with its criticisms of Jews, Catholics and immigrants in Vancouver and Toronto before moving to a booming young Saskatchewan.

    Canada already contained racial and religious extremist groups such as the Orange Order or Sons of England, groups incensed by the growing tide of immigrants and increasing diversity of Canada. As an important quote in your article “None of this was a concern to the pragmatic John A. Macdonald and the eager Canadian colonialists. Indigenous peoples were completely denied their land and human rights.” It is well known that Sir John A. Macdonald was of the Orange Order. The Orange Order played an important role in the crisis over the 1885 trial of Louis Riel for treason. The Canadian prime minister of the day, Sir John A. Macdonald, is believed to have refused to commute Riel’s death sentence because he calculated that there were more Orange votes to be got by hanging Riel than there were Quebec votes to be got by sparing him. He is famously quoted as saying “Riel must die though every dog in Quebec bark in his favour.” The Indian act, and subsequent Residential school policies were also implemented under his government. Both the Orange Order and the Klux Klux Klan’s racial policies were to protect the supremacy of an Anglo-Saxon, Protestant society. It is important to point out most Métis were most of the Catholic faith including Riel.

    Historian Allan Bartley states that this success was a result of opposition to liberal Government of Saskatchewan policy established by the entrenched Saskatchewan Liberal Party, which had held power in the province since its inception in 1905. (Wikipedia). In particular BIGGAR, Sask. where the death of Colten Boushie event occurred in 2016, waves of new immigrants from Eastern Europe eager to start a new life in Saskatchewan in the 1920s provided the Ku Klux Klan with an easy target for its campaign of intolerance.
    The KKK in Saskatchewan held significant sway; it was there in the first province due to the issue of religiously separate schooling for Catholics and Protestants. By the 1930’s the Great depression and economics had lessened the power of the group. KKK tried to re-establish in Saskatchewan in the mid-1980s but failed to gain any real traction.

    In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the white supremacist movement again sprouted, this time from seeds in Alberta, in the form of Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations, which appointed a man named Carney Nerland to be its Saskatchewan representative. The small group was headquartered in the home of Terry Long, who lived in Caroline, Alta.

    In 1991, Carney Nerland, a professed white supremacist, member of the Ku Klux Klan and leader of the Saskatchewan branch of the Church of Jesus Christ Christian Aryan Nation killed a Cree man, Leo LaChance, with an assault rifle. LaChance had entered Nerland’s Prince Albert, Saskatchewan pawn shop to sell furs he had trapped. Carney Nerland was an informant for the RCMP and only served 4 years for his involvement. LaChance’s killing was not a simple accidental homicide. As soon as the trigger was pulled politics came into play. The politics have to do with an informant and the value of that informant to the RCMP. Those politics in turn were legalized, knowingly or unknowingly, with a quick investigation and charge of manslaughter against Nerland. Within a period of three days, from the shooting to when the RCMP informed the Prince Albert police of an informant, the die was cast and Nerland became untouchable. The inquiry became nothing more than a playing out of legalized bigotry in the public arena. If justice has been served with this inquiry, then it is only in the interests of the justice system. There were also questions about the role of the RCMP in the case and its use of the informant protection rule. Although giving without reasonable doubt of a tampered jury, and bias in the regard of Colten Boushie, it strikes a question in everyone’s mind why the past lawyer for the RCMP on the Carney Nerland case, is now the Chief Justice Martel Popescul’s dealing with the case at hand. The history of the players are still recorded in the past events and taint every future decision with their involvement. We are also witness to many colonial attitudes in the media and online forums, with statements such as, “he deserved it – RCMP Facebook forum”, “I should get a badge for killing another Indian” – Carney Nerland. I only provide one prominent case although there are countless that could be quoted here. In the positive, the Saskatchewan event has woken up many to begin the dialogue towards healing the communities, and changing colonial attitudes.

    In conclusion, the Reserve system has created islands of disparity. Riddled with alcohol, drugs and crime due to the colonial system, and the inter-generational abuse families have suffered. Colten Boushie, and partners should not be excused for their misjudgment, in retrospect, I see victims of this disparity. The rise of the First Nations, and Metis youth joining gangs such as the “Indian Posse”, “Red Alert”, “Saskatchewan Warriors”, “Native syndicate” is evident enough there is no other place to turn other than be involved in gang activity. In your article you bring about history of the Residential schools, many of our people now are in the justice system because of this.

    We will forever witness more events like what occurred in Biggar, Saskatchewan, unless the true history of Canada is told. The system of justice must be reviewed paying attention to the past and the treatment of our Indigenous communities. Without it, reconciliation is a moot point, and a meaningless exercise with a certain outcome only to be repeated. Thank you again for your article,

    Name Withheld

  2. Wendy March 31, 2018 at 6:40 pm #

    The issue is not what has happened in the past. The issue today is parenting and the lack thereof within the reservations, the lack of leadership and Chief’s that are so corrupt they prefer to keep their people impaired and unknowing. The Chief lives in a 5,6 or 7 hundred thousand dollar home and another in the sunny southern USA where he “winters”. This is the crime for all people who live and suffer poverty on the res. I beg indigenous youth to go, leave, get an education, work and get out!! This is not living and you are being used by your own. Don’t blame the white man. As far as Colten Boushie, there are two sides to this story. The white man had every right to defend his family as many do in rural areas. A Grandfather sitting and playing scrabble at his kitchen table gets shot three times by intruders who happen to be indigenous youth under the influence. Two young men are at a bus stop where indigenous people rob them, then ask for one of the mens’ eye glasses, then stabs him to death. A visitor to Canada is innocently walking down the street with his brother and is beaten to death by indigenous people……..a lady is beaten almost to death with a pipe and left for dead in a snowbank by indigenous people………………….come on!!!! This has to stop somewhere and money nor apologies will fix it. They have schools, they are given secondary education with tutors included and out of a 30 student class, 2 may finish the course. I wish I had that kind of opportunity. The government laughs because they really don’t have to put out much money when no one takes the opportunity. The drinking, the drugs, the suicidal youth, the incest, rapes, murders within their own community is no one’s fault but their own – the have to take control of themselves and stop blaming other people. There is nothing wrong with our judicial system either other than it being too soft on crime. The indigenous people who went to serve on the Boushie trial excuses themselves because they had already decided that “Gerald Stanley was going to hang”. How can you have these people on a jury???

  3. Name witheld April 15, 2018 at 2:07 am #

    Yes it is a part of history why our communities are in the peril they are now.

    It is also systemic racism.Although the tweet untimed, I agree with Nora Loreto as to her Twitter comments as to ” white privilege” and the Humboldt tragedy.


Leave a Reply